Home > Childproofing > Health and Safety Regulations For Kids

Health and Safety Regulations For Kids

Author: Chris Nickson - Updated: 5 May 2011 | Comment
 
Safe Kids Health And Safety Hsc Conkers

We've seen the stories on television and in the newspapers about children banned from playing conkers unless they wear goggles or flying paper aeroplanes because they've been deemed too dangerous by the people at the Health and Safety Executive (HSE). We've laughed at them, and consider it a nanny state run amok. But the fact is that the incidents have happened. We want to keep our children safe, but where do we find a balance?

The Excesses

Some of the tales might be urban myths, but there's a lengthy catalogue of incidents where the HSE has been involved to stop things – everyday events that have gone on for generations – happening.
  • A tree swing that children had played on for many years was deemed too dangerous by officials.
  • Models from egg cartons, something long used by every child and once a staple of Blue Peter, were banned because of the risk of salmonella from the eggs that had been there.
  • Teachers were not allowed to apply sunscreen to pupils for fear they'd be accused of child abuse.
  • A lifeguard instructor and her husband were prevented from taking their three children into a swimming pool for toddlers because the healthy and safety rules ordained that there must be one adult for every child.
They seem excessive, and they are. Many people, even senior executives, believe that Health and Safety rules have become overly bureaucratic. To most people, that's not criticism enough. Many think it's simply bureaucratic madness.

What's to be Done About it

Children have played tag and climbed trees since time immemorial. It's part of the ritual of childhood, growing up, playing and trying new things, and test boundaries. Part of being a kid is acquiring Scrapes, Cuts and bruises. At the time they can seem like badges of honour.

Schools have to abide by what the health and safety inspectors dictate. That decision is out of their hands. But even the head of the HSE has come out and said that at times his people have made stupid decisions.

You can protest decisions at schools and swimming pools, but don't do it individually. Use an association, gather names for a petition if you feel the rules are restrictive or excessive. In view of comments by the head of HSE, you might be able to affect the outcome this way.

On a personal level, the best rule is to use common sense. Remember, too, that just because things have been a certain way for a long time doesn't mean they're the best way. For generations kids didn't wear bike helmets, but there's general agreement that they've saved many injuries and lives since their introduction. At the same time, you teach your kids the Importance Of Cycle Safety, and wouldn't let them on the main roads until they were old enough to have acquired good road sense.

You know your kids better than anyone, and you can judge what's safe and wise, and what limits to place on them. Children grow in part by pushing boundaries and asserting some independence. Coddling them too much simply isn't good for their development. They need to run and play, to climb trees, fly paper planes and kites, ride their bikes or scooters and play conkers. If the regulations won't let them do those things at school or in organised groups, make sure they have the freedom to do it at home.

You might also like...

Comments...

As far as i am concerned Health and Safety is corrupt. Not only does it stop child development and learning dangers for yourselves, it is a money making racket extorting money out of business. One of the largest branches of Health and Safety is IOSH with branches all over the UK and in Singapore, Hong Kong and the Caribbean. They make their money out of prosecuting firms for any breach of Health and Safety, writing out reports, holding seminars, holding courses and many of their recommendations create rediculous form filling and additional costs to business in compliance. There are many other Health and Safety firms all over the place ELAS etc. There is no need for this costly burocracy, All that is needed is common sense. The original act was brought out in 1974 to protect workers in heavy industry and nuclear plants. Health and Safety has expanded beyong these boundaries into the School Yard and office work. It wants stopping in its tracks.
Brightspark - 16 August 2011 @ 12:44 AM
The problem with extreme risk-averse behaviour with younger children is that the kids grow up to believe that nothing will ever be dangerous. So once they turn 17-18 and move out of the overly-cocooned world provided by schools and parents they think they can drink to huge excess with no consequences, drive cars like idiots with no consequences, and so on. A "salting" of minor danger (and yes, minor injury) at a younger age teaches that some behaviour has consequences, up to and including physical pain.
tonyw - 10 June 2011 @ 12:29 AM
Leave a Comment or Ask a Question...
Title:
(never shown)
Firstname:
(never shown)
Surname:
(never shown)
Email:
(never shown)
Nickname:
(shown)
Comment:
Validate:
Enter word:
Our Quick Links...
Also on Safe Kids...
Our Most Popular...
Add to my Yahoo!
Add to Google
Stumble this
Add to Twitter
Add To Facebook
RSS feed
You should seek independent professional advice before acting upon any information on the SafeKids website. Please read our Disclaimer.